Reference for Bava Kamma 73:21

אמר רב ינאי מרישא נמי דיקא דקתני את שמועד לו משלם נזק שלם ואת שאינו מועד לו [משלם] ח"נ

R. Jannai thereupon said: The same can also be inferred from the opening clause, where it is stated: IN RESPECT OF DAMAGE DONE TO THE SPECIES TO WHICH IT WAS <i>MU'AD</i>, THE PAYMENT WILL HAVE TO BE IN FULL, BUT IN RESPECT OF DAMAGE DONE TO THAT TO WHICH IT WAS NOT <i>MU'AD</i>, THE COMPENSATION WILL BE FOR HALF THE DAMAGE ONLY. Now, this would be in order if you maintain that 'BUT IT WAS NOT <i>MU'AD</i>&nbsp;…'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 205, n. 6. ');">¹⁶</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow